|
本帖最后由 jerrytsao 于 2021-7-17 06:06 编辑
联动对比更高级别的P5800X/Dapustor H3900 https://www.chiphell.com/thread-2315540-1-1.html
https://www.storagereview.com/review/intel-p5510-nvme-enterprise-ssd-review
参赛选手
Intel P5510 7.68T
Memblaze PBlaze6 6920 7.68T
Kioxia CD6 7.68T
Samsung PM1735 3.2T
VDBench Workload Analysis里新增High Load选项
4K Random Read: 100% Read, 128 threads, 0-120% iorate
4K Random Write: 100% Write, 128 threads, 0-120% iorate
4K Random Read (high load): 100% Read, 512 threads, 0-120% iorate
4K Random Write (high load): 100% Write, 512 threads, 0-120% iorate
64K Sequential Read: 100% Read, 32 threads, 0-120% iorate
64K Sequential Write: 100% Write, 16 threads, 0-120% iorate
64K Sequential Read (high load): 100% Read, 64 threads, 0-120% iorate
64K Sequential Write (high load): 100% Write, 64 threads, 0-120% iorate
Synthetic Database: SQL and Oracle
VDI Full Clone and Linked Clone Traces
横轴是IOPS或MB/s越右边越好, 竖轴是延迟越下面越好
4KiB随机读取和写入
64KiB持续读取和写入
SQL数据库测试
Oracle数据库测试
VDI FC存储测试
VDI LC存储测试
除了PM1735 3.2TB比较垃圾, 其它大致在同一水平, 而且PM1735是当中唯一3DWPD混合读写性, 性能却远不及其它1DWPD型号 |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|