|
本帖最后由 seaLittleNerd 于 2024-9-29 11:20 编辑
TLTR: Although Windows 11 24H2 shows improvements over 23H2, it still doesn't match the performance of Windows 10, which remains the superior choice for now. TL;DR and conclusion:
24H2 improves Win11 a lot, and I now no longer consider Win11 the worst OS MS has ever made. However, that certainly doesn't mean I consider it a good OS.
It's still filled with bugs, some of which are bugs that also existed in Win10 but have already been fixed in Win10, but not Win11.
It still requires more tweaking and debloating to make it feel as snappy as Win10 does OOB. If you don't disable most of the OS security features, the File Explorer and UI sludge will always be there. However, once sufficiently debloated, 24H2 now feels equally snappy as a debloated Win10 does, maybe even slightly snappier when doing general tasks like web browsing and folder navigation.
Win11 has way too many bad UI decisions that reduce productivity, there's too much menu nesting, too much group policy editing, and it unnecessarily increases mouse travel and clicks-to-function for too many things within the OS.
If you do install Win11, do yourself a favor and use NLite so you're not wasting time undoing all of the poor UI choices MS made after the OS is installed, and of course for an unattended install with a local account.
While Win11 24H2 does offer performance improvements over Win10 22H2 in some games for Ryzen users, I do not consider the performance difference large enough for the time and effort currently required to equal Win10's superior user experience.
tested_windows_11_23h2_24h2_vs_windows_10_on_amd
|
|